Comments on: Google Home Page On Crack – The Bigger Picture

By: Luke

Luke — Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:46:03 +0000

Well 3 are to much. In some cases it takes to much traffic !

And who is always talking about relevancy ? The same guys that putt 3 places for paid ads !
Luke´s last blog ..Best Online Schools

By: Google Now Corrupting Lingual Identity | Search Engine Journal

Google Now Corrupting Lingual Identity | Search Engine Journal — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 19:51:12 +0000

[...] of Google’s dominance. Like the innocent family members who are forced to deal with their out of control addict parent. Essentially, if anyone in any country effected by this wishes to remain in business for the [...]

By: Alan Bleiweiss

Alan Bleiweiss — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:04:44 +0000

Thanks David

I completely agree that Google is far from done when it comes to further eroding the quality of the results as they continue to hunt for even more profits. They’ve become the beast on a mission that happens so often with companies catering to shareholders. It’s disgusting. Not the desire for profits, the reckless method by which they go about their work.

By: David

David — Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:52:05 +0000

@Alan great post, i have to do a followup post about the 3 entry implications when i get a chance.

This is just the start of where it will be going in 2010, so hang on tear up your client ranking bonuses unless you are working for the big websites. As shown in the results the new layout provides even more weight to the dominate websites.
David´s last blog ..Marketing based in an ideal world begins

By: need bad breath cures

need bad breath cures — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 23:37:47 +0000

Hi. I needed to drop you a quick note to impart my thanks. I’ve been observing your blog for a month or so and have picked up a heap of effective information as well as relished the way you’ve structured your site. I am undertaking to run my own blog however I think its too general and I would like to focus more on smaller topics.

By: Alan Bleiweiss

Alan Bleiweiss — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:05:31 +0000

Social Man – careful what you ask for…

John, Bing’s “relevancy” is stupid. But Google’s gone too far, so yeah… maybe a lot of people start finding stupid relevancy more palatable than searching in the “AOL”ized version of Google.

By: John Santangelo

John Santangelo — Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:42:30 +0000

Google needs a “lite” version, for sure. Still not a fan of Bing’s relevancy, but this is getting ridiculous.

By: Social Man

Social Man — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:27:12 +0000

Come on Google, give us more ads. I just can’t get enough…

By: Alan Bleiweiss

Alan Bleiweiss — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 05:54:27 +0000

Rami

It really is as serious as you describe. Microsoft has killed off lots of small businesses over the years by building in a “similar” solution into the operating system. Google’s doing the same. It’s deplorable.

Thanks Ruud
Yes there was a time when Google was elegant simplicity. Not no more.

By: Ruud Hein

Ruud Hein — Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:02:25 +0000

One of the best take-aparts of what’s been happening to Google’s pages that I’ve read in the past couple of months.

The other day I shared how much I *enjoy* (as in: fun, pleasant, nice, feel-good) using Bing at the moment.

Before adding this comment I went back to do another search and [blows out air] what a breath of fresh air; look at those result pages — wasn’t Google once this simple, clean and straightforward?