<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TOPSEOs Deceptive Practices &#8211; An Interview with Jeev Trika</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/</link>
	<description>SEO industry Thoughts and Rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:26:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-13000</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 03:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-13000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has an overwhelming responsibility when it comes to quality - and to expect that they&#039;d take a stance on ethics regarding a specific result rather than what has already been deemed illegal is something I think is asking too much from an &quot;ideal world&quot; perspective, especially since ethics is so subjective.  Until and unless someone takes TopSEOs to court and wins, I don&#039;t see where Matt&#039;s team could even possibly take such action.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has an overwhelming responsibility when it comes to quality &#8211; and to expect that they&#8217;d take a stance on ethics regarding a specific result rather than what has already been deemed illegal is something I think is asking too much from an &#8220;ideal world&#8221; perspective, especially since ethics is so subjective.  Until and unless someone takes TopSEOs to court and wins, I don&#8217;t see where Matt&#8217;s team could even possibly take such action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QI</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-12997</link>
		<dc:creator>QI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-12997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it&#039;s time for someone to regulate what shows up on Google for any keywords with a minimum # of searches performed daily/monthly?

Google and Cutts must be aware of TopSEOS and the scam. I was under the impressions &quot;quality&quot; was their department. Something as big as TopSEOs should be removed from the index just like any &quot;spam site&quot; or sites infringing on copyrights. The quality department should manually review the website and consider removing it from the index as it is not a QUALITY site being served up in the search results -- that&#039;s the purpose of Google in the first place, to receive high quality, relevant results.

Alan, reach out to us sometime. We&#039;d love to speak with you and bounce ideas around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s time for someone to regulate what shows up on Google for any keywords with a minimum # of searches performed daily/monthly?</p>
<p>Google and Cutts must be aware of TopSEOS and the scam. I was under the impressions &#8220;quality&#8221; was their department. Something as big as TopSEOs should be removed from the index just like any &#8220;spam site&#8221; or sites infringing on copyrights. The quality department should manually review the website and consider removing it from the index as it is not a QUALITY site being served up in the search results &#8212; that&#8217;s the purpose of Google in the first place, to receive high quality, relevant results.</p>
<p>Alan, reach out to us sometime. We&#8217;d love to speak with you and bounce ideas around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Topseos.com Awards For Best SEO Company Not Transparent Enough &#124; Hobo</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-6160</link>
		<dc:creator>Topseos.com Awards For Best SEO Company Not Transparent Enough &#124; Hobo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 01:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-6160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] An informative new twist in the Topseos Awards, lead generation and accused copyright infringment (of article content) saga &#8211; opinion from Alan Bleiweiss on  TOPSEOs Deceptive Practices – An Interview with Jeev Trika [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An informative new twist in the Topseos Awards, lead generation and accused copyright infringment (of article content) saga &#8211; opinion from Alan Bleiweiss on  TOPSEOs Deceptive Practices – An Interview with Jeev Trika [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-5573</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 16:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-5573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mick,

 I&#039;d be happy to see that unfold.  At the same time though, I&#039;m not an attorney and have no clue what&#039;s involved in getting a class action lawsuit going other than assuming there would have to be major evidence of fraud.  Sure, we&#039;ve got a handful of people who have already come out saying such things, but to take it into the courts?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mick,</p>
<p> I&#8217;d be happy to see that unfold.  At the same time though, I&#8217;m not an attorney and have no clue what&#8217;s involved in getting a class action lawsuit going other than assuming there would have to be major evidence of fraud.  Sure, we&#8217;ve got a handful of people who have already come out saying such things, but to take it into the courts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-5561</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 08:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-5561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I say we stop complaining and starting doing something about it. He claims publically to be an &#039;independant authority&#039; yet the rankings are based purely on who is willing to pay and how much. That is, by legal definition fraud. SO, let&#039;s get a class action lawsuit as its evident we could get hundreds of companies to join. The point is to not make money from a lawsuit, but to get this site shut down.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say we stop complaining and starting doing something about it. He claims publically to be an &#8216;independant authority&#8217; yet the rankings are based purely on who is willing to pay and how much. That is, by legal definition fraud. SO, let&#8217;s get a class action lawsuit as its evident we could get hundreds of companies to join. The point is to not make money from a lawsuit, but to get this site shut down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 01:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-2049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know Jeev Trika personally. I met him several years ago. He is nothing but a low-life thief. I guaranteee it. He&#039;ll do black seo technigues on your site like cloaking then bamm... your site&#039;s rank plummets to the depth of no return or is completely banned by Google. But Jeev(the trickster))still wants paid. He need to be banned completly from working on anything to do with the internet. He&#039;s scum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Jeev Trika personally. I met him several years ago. He is nothing but a low-life thief. I guaranteee it. He&#8217;ll do black seo technigues on your site like cloaking then bamm&#8230; your site&#8217;s rank plummets to the depth of no return or is completely banned by Google. But Jeev(the trickster))still wants paid. He need to be banned completly from working on anything to do with the internet. He&#8217;s scum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rohan Rajan</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-1058</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohan Rajan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 21:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-1058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello 

I still remember the day when I paid $2100 to Topseos for their lead generation program (which was costing $2100 for three months/90 leads in 2008) 

Within a period of two week I realized that leads are fake because We have sincerely answered and sent quote to each SEO RFP. But never received reply from all 90 leads. 

I talked to Jeev trika 2-3 times where besides solving the problem with lead program he redirected me to the &quot;term of condition&quot; section on the site which reflects a term which states that they don&#039;t check the quality of leads, whereas their lead program defines a feature that topseos verify each lead and then only dispersed to lead subscribers 

At the end of 3 months I have 90 useless leads with no responce and Topseos earned $2100 for selling me that crap.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello </p>
<p>I still remember the day when I paid $2100 to Topseos for their lead generation program (which was costing $2100 for three months/90 leads in 2008) </p>
<p>Within a period of two week I realized that leads are fake because We have sincerely answered and sent quote to each SEO RFP. But never received reply from all 90 leads. </p>
<p>I talked to Jeev trika 2-3 times where besides solving the problem with lead program he redirected me to the &#8220;term of condition&#8221; section on the site which reflects a term which states that they don&#8217;t check the quality of leads, whereas their lead program defines a feature that topseos verify each lead and then only dispersed to lead subscribers </p>
<p>At the end of 3 months I have 90 useless leads with no responce and Topseos earned $2100 for selling me that crap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; TOPSEOs Continues Deceptive Practices &#124; Search Marketing Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; TOPSEOs Continues Deceptive Practices &#124; Search Marketing Wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 12:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] professionals and business owners who had been deceived, I reached out to Jeev in an attempt to get his side of the story and wrote about it on April 26th.   Three days later, TOPSEOs issued an official apology press [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] professionals and business owners who had been deceived, I reached out to Jeev in an attempt to get his side of the story and wrote about it on April 26th.   Three days later, TOPSEOs issued an official apology press [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; TOPSEOs Apologizes &#8211; Legit or more Deceptive Business? &#124; Search Marketing Wisdom</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-661</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; TOPSEOs Apologizes &#8211; Legit or more Deceptive Business? &#124; Search Marketing Wisdom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] did Jeev Trika finally get the message, and are they really going to implement the changes I called for in my article Monday as well as those required by Chris Elwell from Third Door Media? Will they go [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] did Jeev Trika finally get the message, and are they really going to implement the changes I called for in my article Monday as well as those required by Chris Elwell from Third Door Media? Will they go [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-659</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 05:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#039;re following this story thread, stay tuned - TOPSEOs posted an apology press release today and vowed changes coming.  I have a new article coming out here in the morning reviewing and commenting on the release... 

And thank you to everyone who commented and those who let me know about additional deceptive practices!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re following this story thread, stay tuned &#8211; TOPSEOs posted an apology press release today and vowed changes coming.  I have a new article coming out here in the morning reviewing and commenting on the release&#8230; </p>
<p>And thank you to everyone who commented and those who let me know about additional deceptive practices!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/36 queries in 0.268 seconds using disk
Object Caching 387/440 objects using disk

Served from: searchmarketingwisdom.com @ 2013-05-18 19:22:26 -->