<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The New Twitter &#8211; A Quick Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/09/the-new-twitter-a-quick-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/09/the-new-twitter-a-quick-review/</link>
	<description>SEO industry Thoughts and Rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 09:26:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/09/the-new-twitter-a-quick-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2488</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1718#comment-2488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sasha,

yes, to us it seems like it would be a simple process.  Either it&#039;s not so simple (and I can&#039;t comprehend why that would be), or they just haven&#039;t considered it, or worse, they did and opted not to include the information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sasha,</p>
<p>yes, to us it seems like it would be a simple process.  Either it&#8217;s not so simple (and I can&#8217;t comprehend why that would be), or they just haven&#8217;t considered it, or worse, they did and opted not to include the information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/09/the-new-twitter-a-quick-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2487</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 00:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1718#comment-2487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, it would be so great to see Twitter organize and show you who tweeted your tweets and how many times! I don&#039;t understand why this wasn&#039;t added already because it seems like a pretty simple filtering process and is so obviously useful.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it would be so great to see Twitter organize and show you who tweeted your tweets and how many times! I don&#8217;t understand why this wasn&#8217;t added already because it seems like a pretty simple filtering process and is so obviously useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is a Twitter Retweet, RT? Why don&#8217;t my RT&#8217;s Show? &#171; Pest Control SEO</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/09/the-new-twitter-a-quick-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2127</link>
		<dc:creator>What is a Twitter Retweet, RT? Why don&#8217;t my RT&#8217;s Show? &#171; Pest Control SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1718#comment-2127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Alan Bleiweiss The New Twitter – A Quick Review [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alan Bleiweiss The New Twitter – A Quick Review [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thos003</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/09/the-new-twitter-a-quick-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2126</link>
		<dc:creator>Thos003</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1718#comment-2126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am waiting for that day... =)

Funny enough, people are shocked that I still actually tweet from twitter.  &quot;You don&#039;t use tweetdeck or hootsuite, or FakeItandBakeItsocialautomator?&quot; No... I learned to use twitter just the way they built it. 

But the whole RT thing... there is good and bad to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am waiting for that day&#8230; =)</p>
<p>Funny enough, people are shocked that I still actually tweet from twitter.  &#8220;You don&#8217;t use tweetdeck or hootsuite, or FakeItandBakeItsocialautomator?&#8221; No&#8230; I learned to use twitter just the way they built it. </p>
<p>But the whole RT thing&#8230; there is good and bad to it.<br />
<span class="cluv">Thos003´s last blog ..<a rel="nofollow" href="http://blogpestcontrol.com/2010/09/jerry-the-bug-doctor/">Jerry- the Bug Doctor</a><span class="heart_tip_box"><img class="heart_tip -1" alt="My ComLuv Profile" border="0" width="16" height="14" src="http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/wp-content/plugins/commentluv/images/littleheart.gif"/></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/09/the-new-twitter-a-quick-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2082</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 06:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1718#comment-2082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Dana - yeah I saw that - it&#039;s a redirect to the #! version, but maintains a &quot;200 okay&quot; header instruct on the original.  And didn&#039;t we learn though that everything after the # sign is ignored by Google? Or is using it with the ! after it some sort of signal Google recognizes?  I remember them proposing a way to deal with AJAX, just not sure if this is it, as it&#039;s an area I steer away from.  I&#039;m going to keep an eye on it and see what happens to the SERP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dana &#8211; yeah I saw that &#8211; it&#8217;s a redirect to the #! version, but maintains a &#8220;200 okay&#8221; header instruct on the original.  And didn&#8217;t we learn though that everything after the # sign is ignored by Google? Or is using it with the ! after it some sort of signal Google recognizes?  I remember them proposing a way to deal with AJAX, just not sure if this is it, as it&#8217;s an area I steer away from.  I&#8217;m going to keep an eye on it and see what happens to the SERP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The New Twitter – A Quick Review &#124; Search Marketing Wisdom -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/09/the-new-twitter-a-quick-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The New Twitter – A Quick Review &#124; Search Marketing Wisdom -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 06:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1718#comment-2081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matt Siltala, Dana Lookadoo, Alan Bleiweiss, Alan Bleiweiss, Level-343 Team and others. Level-343 Team said: RT@AlanBleiweiss The New Twitter - almost like they thought about UX even - My Quick Review http://bit.ly/c6IHDg - Ur a big TEASE :) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Matt Siltala, Dana Lookadoo, Alan Bleiweiss, Alan Bleiweiss, Level-343 Team and others. Level-343 Team said: RT@AlanBleiweiss The New Twitter &#8211; almost like they thought about UX even &#8211; My Quick Review <a href="http://bit.ly/c6IHDg" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/c6IHDg</a> &#8211; Ur a big TEASE <img src='http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana Lookadoo</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/09/the-new-twitter-a-quick-review/comment-page-1/#comment-2080</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana Lookadoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 05:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1718#comment-2080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Twitter arrived for me today. Aside from having the feeling I had when learning Microsoft 2007 (distaste), I&#039;m outraged about one simple change:

Visit someone&#039;s profile and a #! has been inserted into the URI. http://twitter.com/#!/username

Imagine what that is going to do to someone&#039;s link profile. I&#039;m already trying to ensure people use the same case I use in each profile, but casing is nothing compared to diluted link equity.

My 2 cents.

Well done write-up Alan. I will miss the good points you addressed. I&#039;m reverting. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Twitter arrived for me today. Aside from having the feeling I had when learning Microsoft 2007 (distaste), I&#8217;m outraged about one simple change:</p>
<p>Visit someone&#8217;s profile and a #! has been inserted into the URI. <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/username" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/#!/username</a></p>
<p>Imagine what that is going to do to someone&#8217;s link profile. I&#8217;m already trying to ensure people use the same case I use in each profile, but casing is nothing compared to diluted link equity.</p>
<p>My 2 cents.</p>
<p>Well done write-up Alan. I will miss the good points you addressed. I&#8217;m reverting. <img src='http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 7/30 queries in 0.089 seconds using disk
Object Caching 338/381 objects using disk

Served from: searchmarketingwisdom.com @ 2013-05-19 21:43:51 -->