<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Search Marketing Wisdom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com</link>
	<description>SEO industry Thoughts and Rants</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 13:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Meta Descriptions Now Count for SEO says Google? by SEO Matt</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/06/meta-descriptions-now-count-for-seo-says-google/comment-page-1/#comment-13457</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 13:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1372#comment-13457</guid>
		<description>I am just reading this now (in 2012), and am curious about how much of this is SEO wisdom is still relevant given the constant changes to Google&#039;s algorithm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just reading this now (in 2012), and am curious about how much of this is SEO wisdom is still relevant given the constant changes to Google&#8217;s algorithm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TOPSEOs Deceptive Practices &#8211; An Interview with Jeev Trika by Alan Bleiweiss</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-13000</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Bleiweiss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 03:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-13000</guid>
		<description>Google has an overwhelming responsibility when it comes to quality - and to expect that they&#039;d take a stance on ethics regarding a specific result rather than what has already been deemed illegal is something I think is asking too much from an &quot;ideal world&quot; perspective, especially since ethics is so subjective.  Until and unless someone takes TopSEOs to court and wins, I don&#039;t see where Matt&#039;s team could even possibly take such action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has an overwhelming responsibility when it comes to quality &#8211; and to expect that they&#8217;d take a stance on ethics regarding a specific result rather than what has already been deemed illegal is something I think is asking too much from an &#8220;ideal world&#8221; perspective, especially since ethics is so subjective.  Until and unless someone takes TopSEOs to court and wins, I don&#8217;t see where Matt&#8217;s team could even possibly take such action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on TOPSEOs Deceptive Practices &#8211; An Interview with Jeev Trika by QI</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2010/04/topseos-deceptive-practices-an-interview-with-jeev-trika/comment-page-1/#comment-12997</link>
		<dc:creator>QI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 22:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=1123#comment-12997</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s time for someone to regulate what shows up on Google for any keywords with a minimum # of searches performed daily/monthly?

Google and Cutts must be aware of TopSEOS and the scam. I was under the impressions &quot;quality&quot; was their department. Something as big as TopSEOs should be removed from the index just like any &quot;spam site&quot; or sites infringing on copyrights. The quality department should manually review the website and consider removing it from the index as it is not a QUALITY site being served up in the search results -- that&#039;s the purpose of Google in the first place, to receive high quality, relevant results.

Alan, reach out to us sometime. We&#039;d love to speak with you and bounce ideas around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s time for someone to regulate what shows up on Google for any keywords with a minimum # of searches performed daily/monthly?</p>
<p>Google and Cutts must be aware of TopSEOS and the scam. I was under the impressions &#8220;quality&#8221; was their department. Something as big as TopSEOs should be removed from the index just like any &#8220;spam site&#8221; or sites infringing on copyrights. The quality department should manually review the website and consider removing it from the index as it is not a QUALITY site being served up in the search results &#8212; that&#8217;s the purpose of Google in the first place, to receive high quality, relevant results.</p>
<p>Alan, reach out to us sometime. We&#8217;d love to speak with you and bounce ideas around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slide Deck &amp; Notes from My SMX Advanced Google Survivor Preso by Etch A Deal</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2011/06/slide-deck-notes-from-my-smx-advanced-google-survivor-panel/comment-page-1/#comment-12818</link>
		<dc:creator>Etch A Deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 16:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=2487#comment-12818</guid>
		<description>Great post Alan. I took your advise from twitter and went through your articles. Now I have to figure out how to implement some of the things you suggest :) 

Thanks once again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Alan. I took your advise from twitter and went through your articles. Now I have to figure out how to implement some of the things you suggest <img src='http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Thanks once again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEO Tool Review: SEM Rush by Puget SEO</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2011/11/seo-tool-review-sem-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-11837</link>
		<dc:creator>Puget SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=2535#comment-11837</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not normally a big fan of SEO tools but from what I&#039;ve seen from SEM Rush so far, I&#039;m pretty impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not normally a big fan of SEO tools but from what I&#8217;ve seen from SEM Rush so far, I&#8217;m pretty impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEO Tool Review: SEM Rush by Emma Miller</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2011/11/seo-tool-review-sem-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-10597</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=2535#comment-10597</guid>
		<description>Hi Joshua, 

I have been using it for 2 weeks now and I actually think its great. Thank you for your feedback it helps me.

Regards

Emma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Joshua, </p>
<p>I have been using it for 2 weeks now and I actually think its great. Thank you for your feedback it helps me.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Emma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEO Tool Review: SEM Rush by SEMrush</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2011/11/seo-tool-review-sem-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-9775</link>
		<dc:creator>SEMrush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 15:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=2535#comment-9775</guid>
		<description>netmeg, you are 100% right. We are working on it. In a couple of weeks 2CO will be left behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>netmeg, you are 100% right. We are working on it. In a couple of weeks 2CO will be left behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How I get 80% of my income Through Social Media by Mike @SEO Maryland</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2011/05/how-i-get-80-of-my-income-through-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-9696</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike @SEO Maryland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=2400#comment-9696</guid>
		<description>@Dr. Pete

Wow, I could only hope some day to have that kind of income breakdown.  If I may ask(and assuming you actually read this), what inspired you to work for yourself and get into the industry?

Anyways, great post for me to stumble upon as I am beginning to start an online business of my own, I&#039;ll be sure to check back for more!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dr. Pete</p>
<p>Wow, I could only hope some day to have that kind of income breakdown.  If I may ask(and assuming you actually read this), what inspired you to work for yourself and get into the industry?</p>
<p>Anyways, great post for me to stumble upon as I am beginning to start an online business of my own, I&#8217;ll be sure to check back for more!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEO Tool Review: SEM Rush by Joshua Titsworth</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2011/11/seo-tool-review-sem-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-9695</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Titsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=2535#comment-9695</guid>
		<description>Hope you enjoy it Glen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope you enjoy it Glen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SEO Tool Review: SEM Rush by Glen</title>
		<link>http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/2011/11/seo-tool-review-sem-rush/comment-page-1/#comment-9694</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchmarketingwisdom.com/?p=2535#comment-9694</guid>
		<description>Great write up josh, got the seo quake plugin on Mozilla plus market samurai, will definitely give the free version of sem rush a go, thanks for the insight!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write up josh, got the seo quake plugin on Mozilla plus market samurai, will definitely give the free version of sem rush a go, thanks for the insight!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 7/42 queries in 0.301 seconds using disk
Object Caching 401/462 objects using disk

Served from: searchmarketingwisdom.com @ 2012-05-22 04:42:15 -->
